Blog

The highly-anticipated Epic Games vs. Apple trial kicked off today in a federal court in Oakland, California, with lawyers for both business delivering opening remarks prior to District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.
Legal Representatives for Epic Games tried to paint the App Store as anti-competitive and monopolistic, keeping in mind that developers are forced to use Apples in-app purchase system, and hence pay Apple a 30% commission on sales. (The rate drops to 15% for subscriptions after the very first year and for certifying designers who sign up for Apples brand-new Small Business Program and make less than $1 million per fiscal year in net earnings.).
Impressive Games described the App Store as a “walled garden” and presented emails from former and current Apple executives like Steve Jobs, Phil Schiller, Craig Federighi, Eddy Cue, and Scott Forstall in an attempt to prove this claim.
Legendary Games desires Apple to be forced to enable third-party app stores on iOS and to let designers provide direct payment systems, however Apple argued that a single, highly-curated App Store is essential to secure the security, privacy, reliability, and quality that consumers have actually concerned anticipate from the business.
” Epic desires us to be Android, but we dont wish to be,” said Apple legal representative Karen Dunn, referring to the ability to sideload apps outside of the Google Play store on Android gadgets. “Our consumers dont want that either,” she included.
Impressive Games is the creator of popular fight royale game Fortnite, which Apple got rid of from the App Store in August 2020, quickly after Epic Games slyly introduced a direct payment alternative in the app, in defiance of the App Store guidelines. Legendary Games then filed a managed suit versus Apple, implicating the business of anti-competitive habits.
At the time, Apple stated Epic Games “took the unfortunate action of breaching the App Store standards that are applied similarly to every designer and created to keep the store safe for our users,” including that it would “strive to deal with Epic to solve these violations so they can return Fortnite to the App Store.” Impressive Games has actually refused to cooperate, nevertheless, and Fortnite stays not available on the App Store.
Epic Games CEO Tim Sweeney testified at the trial today, saying that by presenting the direct payment option, he wanted consumers to see that Apple exercises “overall control” over iOS and software available on the platform.
The trial is anticipated to continue for a total of 3 weeks, with Apples CEO Tim Cook and other executives expected to affirm.

Do not consider reversing. Photo: Apple

How are you discovering iOS 14.5 (and iOS 14.5.1) up until now? Let us understand your thoughts below.

Apple typically stops signing software application updates reasonably quickly after an update is launched to guarantee that as many individuals as possible are running the most recent OS update. “Signing” describes the method Apples servers confirm software application prior to its installation. Just signed packages have the ability to be able to be set up. Its a way of verifying that you are installing a legitimate piece of software application from Apple, and not a hacked version that originates from a different source.
Apple has never, as far as Im conscious, provided definitive reasons for stopping signing older pieces of software application. However, the factors that make good sense involve not having the person-power to continue supporting every variation of its software, and– most likely more importantly– the security ramifications.

As held true with iOS 14.5.1, updates are frequently there to repair bugs and, often, vulnerabilities. Apple wants to ensure that as numerous people as possible are protected from facing issues. Allowing them to downgrade from newer, safer OS versions to older ones for that reason wouldnt make a load of sense.
Apple likely provides a few days of leeway in order to confirm that the new version doesnt have any unexpected bugs. Users might rapidly downgrade to the previous variation while Apple pressed out a fix if it did. Apple stops downgrades when this has been validated to not be the case.

Apple launched iOS 14.5 last Monday. Apple generally stops signing software application updates relatively quickly after an update is released to guarantee that as many individuals as possible are running the newest OS update. If it did, users could quickly downgrade to the previous version while Apple pressed out a repair. When this has been confirmed to not be the case, Apple stops downgrades.

Apple released iOS 14.5 last Monday. One week on, it launched iOS 14.5.1. This repaired a problem with App Track Transparency, stopping some users from getting triggers.
Why Apple stops signing downgrades

Apple has stopped signing iOS 14.4.2 and iPadOS 14.4.2. If youve updated to iOS or iPadOS 14.5, that implies that its no longer possible to downgrade.
The excitedly anticipated iOS 14.5 was a big iOS update for Apple. It presented the ability to open an iPhone utilizing an Apple Watch while using a mask, along with the controversial App Tracking Transparency feature, new emojis and Siri voices, a Podcasts app upgrade, and more.

Apples Podcasts platform is experiencing an “outage” for some users, according to the companys system status page.
” Users are experiencing a problem with this service,” composed Apple. “We are investigating and will upgrade the status as more information becomes offered.” Apple says the undisclosed problem started on April 29.
Only some users are affected by the failure, according to Apple. No further information were provided, and Apple has decreased to comment at this time.
April 29 is the very same day that MacRumors reported about a variety of problems that users have actually made about the Podcasts app since it was redesigned in iOS 14.5, such as skipping during playback, inaccurate timestamps, unresponsive scrolling, episodes failing to sync throughout gadgets after being contributed to a library, and more.
Update: The outage has been marked as resolved on Apples system status page.
( Thanks, Gustavo!).

The highly-anticipated Epic Games vs. Apple trial started today in a federal court in Oakland, California, with lawyers for both companies delivering opening remarks before District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.
Attorneys for Epic Games attempted to paint the App Store as anti-competitive and monopolistic, keeping in mind that developers are forced to use Apples in-app purchase system, and therefore pay Apple a 30% commission on sales. (The rate drops to 15% for memberships after the very first year and for certifying designers who register for Apples brand-new Small Business Program and earn less than $1 million per fiscal year in net profits.).
Impressive Games described the App Store as a “walled garden” and presented e-mails from current and former Apple executives like Steve Jobs, Phil Schiller, Craig Federighi, Eddy Cue, and Scott Forstall in an attempt to prove this claim.
Impressive Games desires Apple to be forced to allow third-party app shops on iOS and to let designers use direct payment systems, but Apple argued that a single, highly-curated App Store is required to secure the security, privacy, dependability, and quality that clients have come to anticipate from the business.
” Epic wants us to be Android, but we dont want to be,” stated Apple lawyer Karen Dunn, describing the capability to sideload apps beyond the Google Play shop on Android gadgets. “Our consumers do not want that either,” she included.
Impressive Games is the developer of popular fight royale video game Fortnite, which Apple eliminated from the App Store in August 2020, quickly after Epic Games slyly introduced a direct payment option in the app, in defiance of the App Store guidelines. Legendary Games then submitted an orchestrated suit versus Apple, implicating the business of anti-competitive behavior.
At the time, Apple said Epic Games “took the regrettable step of breaching the App Store standards that are applied similarly to every designer and created to keep the shop safe for our users,” adding that it would “strive to work with Epic to fix these violations so they can return Fortnite to the App Store.” Legendary Games has actually declined to work together, nevertheless, and Fortnite remains not available on the App Store.
Legendary Games CEO Tim Sweeney affirmed at the trial today, stating that by introducing the direct payment option, he wanted customers to see that Apple exercises “total control” over iOS and software application available on the platform.
The trial is anticipated to continue for a total of three weeks, with Apples CEO Tim Cook and other executives anticipated to affirm.

More than a week following their international launching, Apples AirTag item tracker is now dealing with child safety concerns about its replaceable battery.
AirTags include a standard changeable CR2032 coin-cell battery that Apple states can power an AirTag for a whole year. The battery in an AirTag can be gotten rid of by pressing down and twisting the AirTags back-plate, a relatively straightforward and easy process.
However, the easy battery replacement process has actually prompted issues that a kid might access the battery and possibly pose a security threat to themselves. As reported by Gizmodo, issues are high enough to have actually caused significant Australian merchant Officeworks to temporarily pull AirTags from its shelves.
The seller hasnt confirmed the specific factor, although the report notes that numerous Reddit users have actually stated that an Officeworks representative validated the retailers issues over kid security.
” Staff at the counter might see on their system that they had some in stock, and one employee even remembered offering them on Friday, however they could not find them today,” the user wrote in a post.
They went onto say that an Officeworks agent informed them that the AirTags were removed due to safety concerns, particularly concerning how simple it is for the button-cell battery to be eliminated by a kid.
Furthermore, in a declaration provided to Gizmodo, Apple preemptively confirmed that the battery replacement process is at the center of the retail chains choice to pull AirTags from its shelf momentarily.
” AirTag is created to fulfill global child safety standards, consisting of those in Australia, by needing a two action push-and-turn mechanism to access the user-replaceable battery,” an Apple representative stated in an email to Gizmodo Australia.
” We are following the regulations closely and are working to ensure that our items will meet or surpass brand-new standards, consisting of those for package labelling, well ahead of the timeline needed.”
Officeworks states that AirTags will remain off its shelves until “more assistance is supplied from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission,” which happens to be the exact same authority currently investigating Apple over claims of anti-competitive market habits.
Australian guidelines need that any consumer good that features a battery compartment thats accessible to the customer, whether the battery is intended to be changed, must “be designed to make sure the compartment is resistant to being opened by young children.” Regulations likewise state that the battery compartment should feature “screws or comparable fasteners used to protect the door.”
AirTags do not include any screws visible to the consumer. To access the battery compartment, the user should initially press down and twist the back plate. So, while there are guaranteed issues, its not likely AirTags breaks any direct regulatory stipulation. Rather, its likely that an absence of clearness concerning how Apples AirTags fit with the existing policies has triggered the retailer to pull them.

AirTags dont include any screws visible to the consumer. To access the battery compartment, the user needs to initially push down and twist the back plate. Instead, its most likely that a lack of clearness regarding how Apples AirTags fit with the existing guidelines has actually caused the retailer to pull them.

Apples iPad shipments are expected remain stable in the 2nd quarter of this year, regardless of the effect of international chip scarcities, according to a new report.
The continuous integrated chip lack has been brought on by supply chain problems that developed during the global health crisis and weather-related events like the freeze in Texas that shut down Austin chip plants.
As chip factories struggled to keep up with basic outputs throughout the pandemic, demand rose as people bought devices for an at-home way of life, causing higher costs. As a result, electronics companies purchased up all available supply, leading chip makers to run at capability.
So far, the scarcity has just had minor impacts on the tablet market, which continues to follow its seasonal pattern. International tablet shipments amounted to 35.95 million systems in the first quarter of 2021, down 22.7% sequentially, but 45.5% on year, according to DigiTimes.
The release of new iPad Pro designs will help Apple buck declining patterns in the international market, according to the report, with a lot of non-Apple brands expected to witness sequential declines in second-quarter deliveries.
The consecutive shipment decline in the first quarter was because of slow-season effect and volumes in the second quarter are anticipated to continue suffering from seasonality, seeing a consecutive drop of 6.6%, Digitimes Researchs figures show.
Unbranded or “white-box” tablet suppliers are said to have been seriously struck by the scarcities and have watched their market shares being taken over by low-cost models by brand name suppliers. DigiTimes reports that white-box tablets might be at risk of vanishing from the market entirely in 2022.
Regardless of Apples capability to remain unscathed by the chip shortage in Q2, Bloomberg reports that its 12.9-inch iPad Pro might be in brief supply when it introduces on May 21 due to production issues of the mini-LED display being used in the device.
In general, Apple will seen an effect from the chip lacks and says it expects to see a consecutive decline of roughly $3 to $4 billion income in the third-quarter of 2021 due to iPad and Mac supply restraints. Apple states a combination of the lacks and an extremely high level of demand for both iPad and Mac is anticipated to effect income in the second half of 2021.

Apples Podcasts platform is experiencing an “failure” for some users, according to the businesss system status page.
” Users are experiencing a problem with this service,” wrote Apple. “We are examining and will upgrade the status as more information appears.” Apple says the concealed issue began on April 29.
Just some users are impacted by the interruption, according to Apple. No further information were offered, and Apple has decreased to comment at this time.
April 29 is the exact same day that MacRumors reported about a variety of problems that users have actually made about the Podcasts app because it was revamped in iOS 14.5, such as avoiding during playback, incorrect timestamps, unresponsive scrolling, episodes failing to sync throughout devices after being added to a library, and more.
Update: The blackout has actually been marked as dealt with on Apples system status page.
( Thanks, Gustavo!).

The highly-anticipated Epic Games vs. Apple trial began today in a federal court in Oakland, California, with lawyers for both companies providing opening remarks before District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.
Attorneys for Epic Games tried to paint the App Store as monopolistic and anti-competitive, noting that developers are required to utilize Apples in-app purchase system, and hence pay Apple a 30% commission on sales. (The rate drops to 15% for memberships after the very first year and for qualifying designers who register for Apples new Small Business Program and make less than $1 million per calendar year in net revenue.).
Legendary Games explained the App Store as a “walled garden” and presented e-mails from former and current Apple executives like Steve Jobs, Phil Schiller, Craig Federighi, Eddy Cue, and Scott Forstall in an attempt to show this claim.
Legendary Games wants Apple to be required to allow third-party app stores on iOS and to let designers provide direct payment systems, but Apple argued that a single, highly-curated App Store is essential to secure the security, personal privacy, reliability, and quality that clients have actually come to anticipate from the company.
” Epic desires us to be Android, however we dont desire to be,” said Apple legal representative Karen Dunn, referring to the capability to sideload apps beyond the Google Play shop on Android devices. “Our customers dont desire that either,” she added.
Impressive Games is the creator of popular fight royale game Fortnite, which Apple got rid of from the App Store in August 2020, shortly after Epic Games slyly presented a direct payment choice in the app, in defiance of the App Store rules. Legendary Games then submitted an orchestrated lawsuit versus Apple, accusing the company of anti-competitive behavior.
At the time, Apple said Epic Games “took the regrettable step of violating the App Store standards that are used similarly to every designer and created to keep the store safe for our users,” adding that it would “strive to deal with Epic to resolve these infractions so they can return Fortnite to the App Store.” Impressive Games has refused to comply, nevertheless, and Fortnite remains not available on the App Store.
Impressive Games CEO Tim Sweeney affirmed at the trial today, saying that by presenting the direct payment alternative, he wanted customers to see that Apple works out “overall control” over iOS and software offered on the platform.
The trial is anticipated to continue for an overall of 3 weeks, with Apples CEO Tim Cook and other executives expected to affirm.

AirTags dont feature any visible screws to the customer as described by regulation. To access the battery compartment, a user needs to initially press down and twist the back plate. Rather, its likely a lack of clarity relating to how Apples AirTags fit with the existing guidelines that has actually triggered the merchant to pull them.

More than a week following their international debut, Apples AirTag product tracker is now facing child safety issues about its exchangeable battery.
AirTags feature a basic replaceable CR2032 coin-cell battery that Apple says can power an AirTag for an entire year. The battery in an AirTag can be removed by lowering and twisting the AirTags back-plate, a easy and fairly straightforward procedure.
However, the easy battery replacement procedure has actually prompted issues that a child might access the battery and possibly present a security threat to themselves. As reported by Gizmodo, issues are high enough to have actually triggered significant Auslitran seller Officeworks to momentarily pull AirTags from its shelves.
The retailer hasnt confirmed the specific factor, nevertheless as noted in the report, numerous Reddit users have actually said that an Officeworks agent validated the issues over child security.
” Staff at the counter could see on their system that they had some in stock, and one employee even remembered offering them on Friday, but they could not discover them today,” the user composed in a post.
They went onto state that an Officeworks representative told them that the AirTags were eliminated due to safety issues, specifically concerning how easy it is for the button-cell battery to be removed by a child.
In addition, Apple themselves, in a declaration to Gizmodo, preemptively confirmed that AirTags battery replacement process is at the center of the retail chains choice to pull AirTags from its shelf briefly.
” AirTag is developed to fulfill worldwide kid security requirements, including those in Australia, by needing a 2 step push-and-turn system to access the user-replaceable battery,” an Apple agent said in an email to Gizmodo Australia.
” We are following the guidelines carefully and are working to make sure that our products will meet or surpass brand-new standards, including those for package labelling, well ahead of the timeline needed.”
Officeworks says that AirTags will remain off its shelves until “additional guidance is offered from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission,” which takes place to be the very same authority presently investigating Apple over claims of anti-competitive market habits.
Australian regulations need that any customer excellent that features a battery compartment thats available to the consumer, whether the battery is planned to be replaced, should “be designed to guarantee the compartment is resistant to being opened by children.” Regulations also mention that the battery compartment need to include “screws or comparable fasteners used to protect the door.”
AirTags do not feature any visible screws to the customer as described by guideline. However, to access the battery compartment, a user needs to initially push down and twist the back plate. While there are guaranteed concerns, its unlikely AirTags breaks any direct regulatory clause. Rather, its most likely a lack of clarity concerning how Apples AirTags fit with the existing regulations that has actually triggered the retailer to pull them.