Q&A: Will England’s National Food Strategy help tackle climate change?

Last week, part two of Englands National Food Technique (NFS) was released, supplying a broad summary of the state of the “food system”– an all-encompassing term that covers the production, processing, transport and consumption of food– in England..

The report, which is more than 150 pages long, lays out 14 suggestions for the UK government to think about, including monetary rewards, reporting and trade standards and targets for long-lasting modification in the food system..

The first part of the technique, published in July 2020, provided recommendations for the federal government to address food insecurity and cravings in the face of the Covid-19 pandemic. The newly published 2nd part has actually the stated goal of supplying a “extensive prepare for transforming the food system”..

The federal government has committed to producing a white paper and proposals for future laws in response within the next 6 months, although the early reaction from UK prime minister Boris Johnson has been “noncommittal” to a number of the NFS proposals, according to the Guardian.

In this Q&A, Carbon Brief discusses and takes a look at the report how its recommendations line up– or do not align– with the UKs environment targets and decarbonisation goals.

The NFS is the culmination of more than 2 years worth of conferences and discussions with industry leaders, academics, policymakers and the public.

What is the National Food Strategy?

Its goal was to provide a roadmap for transforming the food system from its present state to one that is healthier for the population and the planet..

Davey includes that, in his view, “every country in the world would take advantage of doing something of this kind”.

The NFS was commissioned by the UK government in 2019 as the first independent review of the governments food policy in almost three-quarters of a century.

Although the scope of the report covers England alone, it keeps in mind that the home countries “food systems are so tightly linked as to be in places inextricable”. It continues that it hopes the devolved governments “might in turn find some helpful concepts” in the method.

This report by @food_strategy has some intriguing and far reaching concepts that would suggest a huge modification for the much better in our food system and make all of us healthier. I hope that these plans will be used up by this government. https://t.co/gl5rZJCrhO— Mick Jagger (@MickJagger) July 15, 2021.

Some have actually criticised the suggestion to tax wholesale sugar and salt as unreasonable or as disproportionately affecting lower-income households. Others state that the steps set out in the report do not go far adequate towards making the food system more sustainable.

The reaction to last weeks release saw members of parliament, star chefs and even rockstars weighing in on its significance.

The NFS has actually certainly brought these issues to the forefront, Edward Davey, the global engagement director of the Food and Land Use Coalition, informs Carbon Brief.

” The global food system is the single greatest factor to biodiversity loss, deforestation, dry spell, freshwater pollution and the collapse of marine wildlife. It is the second-biggest factor to environment modification, after the energy industry.”.

The report itself calls the food system “both a disaster and a wonder”. While the present food system can feeding the “greatest worldwide population in human history”, it says, this comes at a high environmental cost. The report notes:.

Why is the food method essential for taking on environment modification?

Other major contributors to the emissions consist of food, transportation and fertiliser production and product packaging..

Almost half of all food-related emissions are because of agriculture, including rearing animals. The methane produced by cows and other ruminants is “estimated to have actually caused a 3rd of total global warming considering that the industrial transformation”, the report notes.

The food system has seen significantly smaller reductions in sector-wide emissions considering that 2008 as compared to the economy as a whole: economy-wide greenhouse gas emissions have actually reduced by nearly one-third since 2008, however food-related emissions have decreased by just 13% over the same time..

Greenhouse gas emissions from the food sector as a percentage of the 2008 emissions in that sector. Source: The National Food Strategy, Part II.

” Without addressing the emissions of the food system, it will not be possible to meet those climate change obligations [set out by law] and to add to mitigating environment change.”.

Under its commitments to the Paris Agreement, the UK has actually pledged to reduce emissions from 1990 levels by 68% by 2030. The government has likewise set a legally binding target to accomplish net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. Springmann says:.

” Theres quite a great deal of siloed thinking of the food system. From the point of view of integrated nationwide policymaking that provides, its wonderful.”.

Furthermore, virtually all of the gains made in the food sector have been due to cleaner energy and increased efficiency in the energy sector. Changes due to agriculture have actually been minimal– as seen by the big green bar in the chart below.

Trying to produce a much healthier population while farming in a less destructive method requires collaboration across disciplines, Davey tells Carbon Brief. He says:.

Research study suggests that the food system is accountable for about one-third of international greenhouse gas emissions. And the numbers have to do with the very same for the UK, Dr Marco Springmann, a population health scientist at the Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, tells Carbon Brief. (The NFS report puts that figure at 19%, but various research studies draw various limits around what counts as the food sector.).

What parts of the food method could make the greatest influence on climate change?

” The concern is how rapidly will those reforms really resolve the environment difficulty … I think the jurys out. Is it not as ambitious as it should be, from the viewpoint of what the land sector requires to do to achieve the UK national targets? I dont know. Its certainly a step in the best instructions, however theres most likely an argument that its not enthusiastic enough.”.

The proposed framework uses the “three compartment design”, which strives for a balance in between semi-natural land, low-yield farmland and high-yield farmland to satisfy the targets of both sustainability and food production.Investing ₤ 1bn in UK Research and Innovation and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), as well as smaller centres to stimulate innovation to “create a better food system”. Presenting compulsory reporting on a variety of metrics for food business using more than 250 people. These metrics would consist of the tonnage of food waste generated.Creating a nationwide food system data programme, which would allow services and the federal government to assess their development on the goals laid out in the report.

Davey calls the suggestions a “excellent starting point”. He includes:.

A number of the suggestions made in the report relate in some method to environment change or environmental sustainability. These recommendations include:.

What are the restrictions of the food technique in attending to climate change?

The report likewise “really shied” far from taking a strong position on lowering meat consumption, Springmann says, with influence on both the environment and public health. He states:.

” Another thing that seems to be missing is that foresighting, wheres the world going to from other sectors … Theres going to be a change in farming … And its going to take years [for the recommendations in the report] to come to fulfillment by which time the world may have altered.”.

Gill likewise notes that the report, while comprehensive, does not completely consider the unintentional repercussions of its suggestions. For example, a much higher percentage of fresh vegetables and fruits is wasted than meat. So the recommendations to consume less meat might increase the amount of food waste.

The food system “is extremely complex”, Gill states, “but I dont believe thats any excuse for not in fact highlighting a few of those issues right at the start”.

The commissioning of the report– it was led by business owner and restaurateur Henry Dimbleby– indicates the report itself “reveals a little bit of a manipulated focus” towards business-focused solutions, Springmann says.

For example, the recommendation towards investing in innovation lists alternative proteins as a key area in requirement of research study financing. Nevertheless, Springmann says, the alternative-protein industry is already extremely strong. He tells Carbon Brief:.

” There are currently a lot of meat replaces on the marketplace and even more so when you consider natural meat substitutes like more beans, lentils and those kinds of things … Explaining more plainly that healthy and sustainable diet plan doesnt always need to consist of processed meat options would have been essential, however that was missed out on there and rather this sort of pro-business angle was taken.”.

” If you take the food system as a holistic thing, then you truly need to attend to all kinds of problems. And if you wish to deal with appropriately the ecological concerns, plus the health issues, you truly have to deal with the overconsumption of animal-sourced foods in our diets.”.

The suggestions “seem to be practically sort of looking in reverse instead of looking forward”, Prof Maggie Gill of the University of Aberdeen and chair of the Scottish Science Advisory Council, informs Carbon Brief. She includes:.

Limousin beef livestock in a barn feeding on hay, Selside UK. Credit: John Bentley/ Alamy Stock Photo.

How does the food method address the contending interests of farming land use and land use for carbon sequestration?

UK prime minister Boris Johnson has already suggested his hesitancy to support some of the policy recommendations laid out in the report. This does not bode well for the reports adoption, cautions Springmann:.

” Implementation of any of those recommendations truly requires political will … The recommendations themselves might have been more progressive, but even the ones that exist do not seem to resonate extremely much with policymakers that are in power at the minute.”.

Minimizing meat intake would likewise assist ease the strain on land resources, the report finds. About 70% of the landmass of the UK is dedicated to farming, with feed and pastures for beef and lamb using up the huge majority of that land.

Nature-based services, such as peatland repair and afforestation, are anticipated to play a major function in many nations and companies net-zero targets, however numerous of these require the repurposing of farming land.

Receive our free Daily Briefing for a digest of the previous 24 hours of climate and energy media coverage, or our Weekly Briefing for a round-up of our content from the past seven days. Just enter your email below:.

The right-hand side of the chart, utilizing the exact same scale, shows how much land is used abroad to produce food for the UK. The combined land area for raising beef and lamb for UK usage is bigger than the UK itself. Source: The National Food Strategy, Part II.

” The kind of land that might deliver the best ecological benefits is often not really agriculturally efficient. The most efficient 33% of English land produces around 60% of the total output of the land, while the bottom 33% just produces 15%.”.

The chart listed below programs how all land in the UK is assigned (left) and just how much overseas land is utilized to produce food for the UK (ideal).

Overall carbon expenses (kgCO2e) per kilogram of different foodstuff. The teal bars indicate the direct emissions connected with the supply chain of each item, while the yellow bars reveal the carbon “opportunity cost”, meaning the quantity of CO2 that might be sequestered in the land used to produce that food. Source: The National Food Strategy, Part II.

In order to address these competing interests, the report calls for a national land-use technique to finest assign land to nature, carbon sequestration and farming.

The government has dedicated to producing an action to the technique, consisting of proposals for brand-new legislation, within the next 6 months..

The report notes that with the right incentives for farmers to repurpose their land, the method could be equally helpful towards farmers and the environment. It mentions:.

The report itself calls the food system “both a wonder and a disaster”. The proposed structure utilizes the “3 compartment model”, which strives for a balance between semi-natural land, low-yield farmland and high-yield farmland to satisfy the targets of both sustainability and food production.Investing ₤ 1bn in UK Research and Innovation and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), as well as smaller centres to stimulate development to “create a much better food system”. These metrics would include the tonnage of food waste generated.Creating a national food system information program, which would permit services and the federal government to assess their progress on the objectives laid out in the report. The right-hand side of the chart, utilizing the exact same scale, reveals how much land is utilized abroad to produce food for the UK. The teal bars suggest the direct emissions associated with the supply chain of each item, while the yellow bars show the carbon “opportunity expense”, suggesting the amount of CO2 that could be sequestered in the land used to produce that food.

As an outcome, the report states, the food system is being “asked to perform an accomplishment of balancings” in supplying adequate land to produce the essential food, however also to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

” Globally, the greatest possible carbon advantage of eating less meat would not in fact be the decrease in emissions, but the chance to repurpose land so that it sequesters carbon.”.

Sharelines from this story.

The UKs Climate Change Committee (CCC) has actually approximated that just over 20% of agricultural land need to be rewilded or transformed to bioenergy or other, non-agricultural crops in order to accomplish net-zero by 2050. The NFS report states:.

Establishing the method will include collecting data on farming performance, priority nature locations for conservation (such as existing peatlands) and highly polluted areas. It will likewise construct on work such as Englands trees and peat action plans– launched previously this year– in order to recognize the land best suited for nature repair..

The chart listed below shows that when the carbon sequestration “chance expense” (yellow bars) is added to the emissions of various food groups (teal bars), the carbon expense of lamb and goat meat really exceeds that of beef, due to the large amounts of land required to graze those animals and their cravings for tree saplings.